<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Is it possible for a new elevator to mess up my adsl line?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.techenigma.com/2010/01/is-it-possible-for-a-new-elevator-to-mess-up-my-adsl-line/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.techenigma.com/2010/01/is-it-possible-for-a-new-elevator-to-mess-up-my-adsl-line/</link> <description>Technology.Simple</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:02:55 +1100</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: annorax64</title><link>http://www.techenigma.com/2010/01/is-it-possible-for-a-new-elevator-to-mess-up-my-adsl-line/comment-page-1/#comment-7778</link> <dc:creator>annorax64</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 04:07:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.techenigma.com/2010/01/is-it-possible-for-a-new-elevator-to-mess-up-my-adsl-line/#comment-7778</guid> <description>Yes, this is a very real possibility.I would suggest relocating the entire phone line as far away from the new elevator as possible to try to minimize the interference.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div
class="KonaBody"> <!-- google_ad_section_start --><br
/></p><p>Yes, this is a very real possibility.</p><p>I would suggest relocating the entire phone line as far away from the new elevator as possible to try to minimize the interference.<br
/> <br
/> <!-- google_ad_section_end --></p></div><p></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/10 queries in 0.003 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 385/389 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.techenigma.com @ 2012-02-11 21:33:22 -->
